I am a Citizen for a Better America
Posted on April 10th, 2010 in Articles | 2 Comments »
I BELIEVE IN GOD,
and I AM A
CITIZEN FOR A
BETTER AMERICA!
One Nation Under God
Charles Tolbert your Presidential Candidate for 2012
Paid for by Charles Frederick Tolbert Your president for 2012
A Citizen for a Better America
Send your donations to your Community
Assistance Program (CAP) contributions in the
name of Citizen for a Better America
www.cfabamerica.com
2 Responses
GENUINE and SAVVY orthodox-fundamentalist Christians and Jews insist on
Newton Leroy Gingrich for GOP presidential candidate instead of being
stuck and incumbered with Willard Romney – yet Willard Mitt Romney is said
to currently have far more pre-Convention delegates (both “soft” and
“hard”).
We, who are authentically moral and rational, thus hope for a brokered GOP
2012 Convention in Tampa, in which Santorum will give his delegates to
Gingrich, and Romney’s delegates will change their minds, turn against
Mitt, and vote for Newt. Ron Paul would be wise to advise his
no-government-interference no-foreign-involvement delegates to also turn
to Gingrich.
http://www.thegreenpapers.com/P12/candidates.phtml
————————————————————————-
The [purported] positives of the so-called “Patient Affordable Care Act”
(i.e. ObamaScare):
One Obominite propagandist stated: “Before reform, hundreds of thousands
of families each year would find themselves on the brink of bankruptcy
just because someone got sick. Pre-existing conditions allowed insurance
companies to deny coverage to children. A coverage gap for prescription
drugs caught seniors by surprise, costing them hundreds of dollars out of
pocket.”
But, in fact, in 2006 (during the Pelosi-as-House-Speaker reign) and then
after the Election of 2008, anti-George-Bush subversives got the upper
hand and elected Obama to tyrannically and “fundamentally change America”
into a bureaucratic socialist dictatorship. So on March 23rd 2010,
secretive /Obama/Pelosi/Reid closed-door manipulators made history by
imposing the [so-called] Affordable Care Act.”
Now, two years later, folks are starting to see the real-life impact of
“reform.”
According to Obominite hype: “In Minnesota alone, 2 million people no
longer have a lifetime limit on coverage; 392,000 women have seen their
coverage for preventive services like mammograms expanded; 307,000 seniors
and people with disabilities who have Medicare have already received free
preventive care; and 32,000 young people who would otherwise be uninsured
are staying on their parents’ insurance plans until they turn 26.”
But Secretary of Energy Chu, the Secretary of the Interior, and the EPA
Direction have done practically NOTHING to get the mass-production of
TRULY-affordable all-electric vehicles going BEFORE and instead of raising
gasoline prices by forbidding new drilling for oil in our own country, and
selling what oil we do drill to hate-American foreign nationals.
Nor has the Secretary of Transportation made our highway system and speed
limits compatible for slower-moving all-electric vehicles.
The verifiable negatives of the [alleged] “Patient Affordable Care Act”
(i.e. ObamaScare):
1. The CBO, within the past few days, estimated that instead of
ObamaScare costing $900M over a decade, it will instead cost $1.7T.
2. The forced-insurance-purchase Individual Mandate will cause the
already-impoverish into foreclosure and bankruptcy.
3. It is non-constitutional for the federal or state governments to force
any American to buy any commercial product or service.
4. ObamaScare will be administered by a panel of a few
non-congressionally-appointed Rationing Czars who will, in effect, choose
to cut the benefits of, plus lethally deprive, treatment against (not
“for”) those politically opposed to Obama and his regime.
5. Most Americans neither want nor need senseless and abusive mammograms,
nor most other “medical” “preventative” “care.”
6. Most young people under 26 do not need to stay under their parent’s
medical policies, nor any health-insurance policy at all.
7. Forcing health insurance companies to take on everyone with
pre-existing conditions, especially those they themselves are at fault
for, will cause such companies to go belly up. It is like forcing casinos
to give out jackpot winnings to everyone who pulls the handles on in-house
slot machines. What kind of gambling is that?
8. Most seniors are needlessly dependent on too many pharmaceuticals as it
is – which drugs causing both obvious short-term and hidden long-term
harmful effect – whereas they would survive much better with faith and
trust and morality in Jesus as God and Lord, drinking healthy juices,
eating a well-balanced menu of foods, plus resting and moderately
exercising enough.
9. Any emergency hospitalization can be covered by adequately adjusting
already-existing Medicare, and bankruptcy recourse should be allowed for
those who require emergency treatment through no obvious fault of their
own.
————————————————————————-
Did not Mitt Romney learn anything as a quasi-deacon in the moralistic
Mormon church he grew up in and is affiliated with? So why did he so
change his position from adamantly being abortion-choice . . . to
[supposedly and probably-deceitfully] becoming “pro-life?” – on something
as theologically and Biblically basic as whether or not to murder non-born
human womb-babes by committing and not performing abortion-homicide? Why
was he even abortion-choice to begin with at all?
It’s as if true-Jew Saint Paul, and formerly one duce of a
devoutly-dogmatic Jewish-Pharisee Saul, had said, “I never was for G-d but
instead was always against Him from the beginning, because I always hated
His guts and cursed Him as much as I could whenever I could. But, later
on, I saw the light, and changed my mind, so now I do not curse Him as
much anymore.”
The GOP’s RNC, and state affiliates thereof, supporting Romney instead of
Gingrich, along with “jewish” and non-Jewish network-media subversives
disparaging, discounting, and discrediting Newt Gingrich, reminds me of
the nazis in the movie Raiders of the Lost Ark digging in the wrong place
nearby where the Ark of the Covenant had been buried.
Yours truly would strongly recommend that no one give any money to the GOP
RNC or State affiliates thereof unless they are absolutely certain that
that monetary contribution will assuredly go to nominate Newt Gingrich as
the GOP presidential-candidate nominee. Why allow it to deceitfully
instead be diverted to nominate Mitt Romney, and thus “throw your pearls
before swine,” and “give dogs what is holy?”
The incessant and harshly-dogmatic, satanic mantras of
pro-Romney-pontificating cowardly-”conservative,” RINO-consortive,
radio-network-talkshow wrongheads, along with bassackward-immentality
Romney-endorsing GOP governors and senators (in close cohoots with
republicrats who sadistically desire to bankrupt the
Social-Security-dependent poor by Flat-Tax mandate and thus force them to
lose IRS low-income cutoff and Standard Deductions so as to start paying
IRS taxes) . . . belligerently blattering out that:
“all republicans will support whoever the only-for-the-rich, waffling and
windsniffing, homogay-inclusive, Massachusetts-insurance-mandate, actually
pro-abortion-choice, GOP presidential candidate is”
or:
“all republicans (and enough Obama-loyalist-democrats and
mistrusting-GOP-candidates independents) will eventually all rally around
Romney” . .
…….. . . are deceptively fraudulent presumptions of
irresponsibly-absurd defeatist propaganda.
This webpage author is a bonafide ‘born-again’ Christian evangelical, who
would [of course] indeed vote for solid-on-sexual-social-issues Newt
Gingrich, but will definitely vote 3rd party (probably aligning with the
Constitution Party if Mitt Romney becomes the GOP presidential candidate
in 2012 (no matter who Romney chooses for VP running mate).
Limbaugh-supportive and yet-loyal new and older advertisers – plus who for
and what those Rush-supportive advertisers advertise regarding company
products and services – deserve your meager and limited purchase money,
and will obviously make best moral use of it for the sake of
quite-qualified-to-become-President Newt Gingrich.
Boycott the sponsors who dropped and will not reinstate advertising for
Limbaugh, who would take your purchase funds and give them to manipulative
Obama/Romney media conspirators and diabolical election-shenanigans
devil-Obama subversives.
While perusing the Tube, and encountering Obama, it behooves the sane and
rational to mute the sound with the remote control button to silently
watch the half-negroid, born-in-Kenyan/lying-about-Hawaii deceiver, who -
with insidious cunning craftiness and weaselword satanspeak – impudently
rants on while taking House-Republicans-based credit for what he and his
demoncrats have no right to steal credit from, promising betterment as
things actually get worse, brown-nosing
confusion-and-consternation-causing sexist feminists, cowering to
arrogantly-incindiary homogay perverts, patronizing Israeli Jews for
politically self-aggrandizing purposes, threatening sexual purists,
fanning the flames of retaliatory fundamentalist-orthodox
catholi-protestants as gasoline prices disasterously inflate relating to
the wildly-fluctuating yoyo-like Stock Market.
WILL lying-[Mombasa-Kenyan-not-Hawaiian-born] Barack Obama brag about all
he himself (allegedly) along with his democrat cohorts (like
filthy-mouthed guttermind and bonafide-bunghole Bill Maher and even goof
Jon Stewart) have done to keep America going during the past year? Will he
take credit for what he alone and his activist supporters have supposedly
done to [allegedly] keep all Christians and Jews from not going bankrupt,
loosing their residences and jobs, and dying off?
Will the socialistic Chicago Agitator and ACORN ballot-box-stuffer take
credit for dependable sunlight and gravity, lack of planetary destruction
by asteroid, absence of volcanic eruption, and no devastating earthquakes
in major cities?
For what – in fact – House Republicans have done to constrain him and his
demonutzos, which GOP has facilitated continuously-smooth law-and-order
operation of the country?
Will Barack “Barry Soetoro” Hussein Obama remind us of how Pelosi’s/Reid’s
Obamascare will force the impoverished to purchase health insurance under
his Individual Mandate, and tyrannize doomed health-insurance companies to
insure everyone with preexisting conditions (which many of such
irresponsible crippled were to blame for handicapping themselves?
Has Obama opened up America’s fossil-fuel resources and brought the price
of gasoline down to $1.99 a gallon like it was before . . . or will he
continue to capitulate to his waffling Energy Secretary Chu (and others
like him who probably want everyone to “save energy” by repeatedly turning
off the lights and then turning them on again to burn out light bulbs
quicker and thus waste more money) and shelve gasoline engines without
first putting something adequate enough its place (and we’re not talking
green companies making no profit with wind generators that don’t turn on
when there is no wind, and pathetically-weak photovoltaic cells which
product little juice when it is cloudy and none at night – all for the
purpose of saving some endangered locust or earthworm per the insane
hallucinations of nutcase environmentalists?
Has he enraged Al Qaeda operatives by conspiring to murder Osama bin Laden
without trial – unlike what George W. Bush did against Saddam Hussein?
Has Obama snubbed Netanyahu and both deceitfully patronized yet
inhibitorily worked against both Israeli security and settlements by
imposing pass-the-buck war-mongering . . . dangerously disrupting the
status quo in Egypt and Libya?
Has Obama put two inferior-gender, pro-abortion-choice, life-term
feminists on the High Court, and lauded Planned-Parenthood abortionists -
thus co-conspiring to murder scads of non-born womb babes . . . far worse
than Rush inferring that contraceptives-for-fornication-insinuati ng
females-sterilization-accommodating anti-women’s-health Sandra Fluke was
(by probable sordidly-lewd and lascivious intention) what he rightly
inferred?
Is his intent with discontinuing ‘Don’t-Ask-Don’t-Tell’ to promote
homoperversity – thus weakening our our Obama-defunded military. . . .or
instead to expose them as the pink-triangle-reminiscent,
concentration-camp-deserving, disgusting sinners and anti-heterosexual
harassers they actually are?
Read the informative transcript available at breakingnews.topcities.com to
find out!
Being that Americans already have “socialized medicine” and
“government-run healthcare” with Medicare (which should begin at age 60
and not age 65, concordant with . . .
Leviticus 27:7 And if the person is sixty years old and upward, then your
valuation for a male shall be fifteen shekels, and for a female ten
shekels.
Second Chronicles 11:21 [NON-porn, NON-prostitute?] Rehoboam loved Maacah
the daughter of Absalom above all his wives and concubines (he took
eighteen wives and sixty concubines, and had twenty-eight sons and sixty
daughters).
First Timothy 5:9 Let a widow be enrolled if she is not less than sixty
years of age, having been the wife of one husband
…….. . . so-called Obamacare (or, better put: Forced-Individual-Mandate
ObamaScare) should be replaced with what Alan Grayson suggested:
Cradle-to-Grave Medicare.
To force individuals to buy any commercial good or service (such as a food
item or vehicle) with non-free-market rationing regulations (as ObamaScare
does, with IRS tax penalty for those who fill out Form 1040) is obviously
non-constitutional.
Should Romney and even Santorum drop OUT of the GOP presidential-candidate
race – for the sake of Newt Gingrich?
Should Romney and even Santorum stay IN the GOP presidential-candidate
race – for the sake of Newt Gingrich – up to a brokered 2012 GOP National
Convention in Tampa?
IF Mitt Romney and even interruptively-rude rookie-hotshot Rick Santorum
suspended their presidential-candidate campaigns now, would not all of
Obama’s mega-funded vitriolic and venomous anti-Gingrich network media
overwhelmingly attack and wear out Gingrich alone?
It is clear that Romney is a verified handsome but cultically-mormonic,
deceptive and Mandate-imposing, RINO-endorsed, windsniffing-waffler,
blatantly-then-undercover-pro-choice loser (as seen in
http://videoclips12.tripod.com) . . . assuredly not able himself to take
on Kenyan-not-Hawaiian-born Obama (exposed in
http://lyingaround.tripod.com) . . . in victorious debate, nor get the
support of somewhat-disillusioned Obamanites nor disappointed Independents
nor even moderates, and especially not
genuinely-Christian-and-fervently-activi st moral-social-issues
Republicans (who would rather vote Constitution Party and let the chips
fall where they would if Romney got to be the GOP nominee).
But, as the open-minded, non-prejudiced, and carefully-attentive reader
can detect by the following hotlinked videoclip, Rick Santorum is another
one who (like Obama and Romney) has explicitly stated that the Scriptural
dogma and doctrines of the Catholic Church will in no way influence his
public-policy decisions as a potential president . . . thus exposing
Santorum as an inept, snobbishly-arrogant, impulsive-comments novice who
has NOT the crucial experience, social-issues track-and-voting record, nor
professionalism which – in stark contrast – Mr. Gingrich certainly has.
As one can obviously hear in the videoclip, Santorum accuses Iranian
leadership of “discriminating against women and gays.”
And gays?
Should not homogays indeed be non-inclusively discriminated against – no
matter what type of government?
The facist-nazi Adolf Hitler ordered that pink triangles (his version of
eliminating ‘Don’t-Ask-Don’t-Tell’) be put on homosexuals during the 30s
or 40s and confined in concentration camps, plus sent his Gestapo to
suddenly execute homo-bullyboy brownshirt nazi thugs who got Hitler into
power (which noble anti-homosexual purge the Biblically-based German
Christian church of course did not object to).
WHY does Santorum condemn Iranian leadership about women being “abused”
and “oppressed?” Does not pseudo-”catholic” Santorum believe that nuns
should have the holy habit of being dressed modestly in the equivalent of
burkas and hijabs?
IF Iranian (and other Middle-Eastern islamic-fundamentalist) women truly
thought that they were being “abused” and “oppressed” by voluntarily
choosing to accomodate to the Koranic-interpretation general-consensus
dresscode of being dressed very modestly in public view on warm days, WHY
do such women (emigrating into the United States, and coming under the
power and authority of non-sharia American law-enforcement) still choose
to be dressed modestly in burkas and hijabs when in general public view on
warm days?
Do they not see what their hedonist porn-in-motion bikini-clad
harlot-sight neighbors are mis-wearing as they shamelessly and defiantly
flaunt loose long hair, naked arms bared with sleeveslessness, nude legs
bared with shortened skirts and shorts, and soxless feet in flipflop
sandals?
Hey, like all other women in America, each fundamentalist-islamic woman
has a brain of her own to be aware of what is going around her and what
her potentially-licentuous options are, a mouth of her own to call 911 if
harassed or molested by extremist-to-them dictates or dogma, and two feet
of her own to escape to a police station – to be dressed however she wants
in accord with the liberty and freedom of American fashions and styles.
Moreover, fundamentalist-muslim women are quite capable of depriving
fundamentalist-muslim men of sexual submissiveness if such women thought
that dresscode-concordant fundamentalist-islamic men deserved such
divorce-and-alienation-causing non-reproductive frigidity. And who needs
men when they could sodomize with “liberated” american women as despicable
and disgusting hell-bound lesbians?
So why don’t American muslims mis-dress like the other lewd-exhibitionist
pervertesses around them?
Why does Santorum castigate Iranian men and women for dressing modestly,
while pandering to “gays” to not discriminate against them?
Who is the true “evangelical-Christian” “conservative?”
Is it not Newt?
Santorum criticizes Iran for being anti-homogay
Most of us have heard the vow, or at least promise, required to be stated
by witnesses “on the stand” who are to be interrogated by both prosecuting
and defense attorneys in courtrooms:
Do you promise to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth?
…….. . . to which the proper reply is something like:
“I do” or “Yes.”
Such intentions are congruent with the Scripture references:
Exodus 20:16 You shall not bear false witness against your neighbor.
Deuteronomy 5:20 Neither shall you bear false witness against your neighbor.
Matthew 19:18 He said to him, “Which?” And Jesus said, “You shall not
kill, You shall not commit adultery, You shall not steal, You shall not
bear false witness . . .”
Mark 10:19 You know the commandments: “Do not kill, Do not commit
adultery, Do not steal, Do not bear false witness, Do not defraud, Honor
your father and mother.”
Luke 18:20 You know the commandments: “Do not commit adultery, Do not
kill, Do not steal, Do not bear false witness, Honor your father and
mother.”
Colossians 3:9 Do not lie to one another, seeing that you have put off the
old nature with its practices.
Even telling a partial lie: “You shall not die” [completely?; all at
once?] – as The Tempter did to inferior-gender Eve in The Garden of Eden -
is exposed and disallowed by the above-stated verses.
Antagonistic reaction and retort is not expected for kindly correction
which is justified:
First Corinthians 4:21 What do you wish? Shall I come to you with a rod,
or with love in a spirit of gentleness?
Second Corinthians10:1 I, Paul, myself entreat you, by the meekness and
gentleness of Christ-I who am humble when face to face with you, but bold
to you when I am away!
Galatians 5:22 But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, patience,
kindness, goodness, faithfulness,
Galatians 5:23 gentleness, self-control; against such there is no law.
Galatians 6:1 Brethren, if a man is overtaken in any trespass, you who are
spiritual should restore him in a spirit of gentleness. Look to yourself,
lest you too be tempted.
First Timothy 6:11 But as for you, man of God, shun all this; aim at
righteousness, godliness, faith, love, steadfastness, gentleness.
Second Timothy 2:25 correcting his opponents with gentleness. God may
perhaps grant that they will repent and come to know the truth
First Peter 3:15 but in your hearts reverence Christ as Lord. Always be
prepared to make a defense to any one who calls you to account for the
hope that is in you, yet do it with gentleness and reverence
However, when the criticism is injust, then the opposite reaction is to be
expected:
Titus 1:13 This testimony is true. Therefore rebuke them sharply, that
they may be sound in the faith
It does no one any good for a critic to be quick to condemn judgmentally:
Ecclesiastes 5:2 Be not rash with your mouth, nor let your heart be hasty
to utter a word before God, for God is in heaven, and you upon earth;
therefore let your words be few.
Matthew 7:1 Judge not, that you be not judged.
Luke 6:37 Judge not, and you will not be judged; condemn not, and you will
not be condemned; forgive, and you will be forgiven.
James 1:19 Know this, my beloved brethren. Let every man be quick to hear,
slow to speak, slow to anger.
James 3:2 For we all make many mistakes, and if any one makes no mistakes
in what he says he is a perfect man, able to bridle the whole body also.
And a potentially inflammatory situation is exacerbated by being
legalistically nitpicky about something of someone:
Matthew 12:7 And if you had known what this means, “I desire mercy, and
not sacrifice,’ you would not have condemned the guiltless.
Matthew 23:24 You blind guides, straining out a gnat and swallowing a camel!
Mark 7:6 And he said to them, “Well did Isaiah prophesy of you hypocrites,
as it is written, ‘This people honors me with their lips, but their heart
is far from me.
Mark 7:7 in vain do they worship me, teaching as doctrines the precepts of
men.’ ”
…….. . . especially when one does not have all the facts:
Proverbs 18:17 He who states his case first seems right, until the other
comes and examines him.
…….. . . and accuses with malicious arrogance:
Psalms 17:10 They close their hearts to pity; with their mouths they speak
arrogantly.
Psalms 73:3 For I was envious of the arrogant, when I saw the prosperity
of the wicked.
Psalms 94:4 They pour out their arrogant words, they boast, all the
evildoers.
Psalms 101:5 Him who slanders his neighbor secretly I will destroy. The
man of haughty looks and arrogant heart I will not endure.
Psalms 140:5 Arrogant men have hidden a trap for me, and with cords they
have spread a net, by the wayside they have set snares for me.
Proverbs 16:5 Every one who is arrogant is an abomination to the Lord; be
assured, he will not go unpunished.
Proverbs 21:24 ‘Scoffer’ is the name of the proud, haughty man who acts
with arrogant pride.
Isaiah 10:12 When the Lord has finished all his work on Mount Zion and on
Jerusalem he will punish the arrogant boasting of the king of Assyria and
his haughty pride.
Isaiah 13:11 I will punish the world for its evil, and the wicked for
their iniquity; I will put an end to the pride of the arrogant, and lay
low the haughtiness of the ruthless.
Habakkuk 2:5 Moreover, wine is treacherous; the arrogant man shall not
abide. His greed is as wide as Sheol like death he has never enough. He
gathers for himself all nations, and collects as his own all peoples.”
Malachi 4:1 “For, hey, the Day comes, burning like an oven, when all the
arrogant and all evildoers will be stubble; the day that comes shall burn
them up,” says the Lord of hosts, “so that it will leave them neither root
nor branch.”
First Corinthians 4:19 But I will come to you soon, if the Lord wills, and
I will find out not the talk of these arrogant people but their power.
First Corinthians 5:2 And you are arrogant! Ought you not rather to mourn?
Let him who has done this be removed from among you.
First Corinthians 13:5 it is not arrogant or rude. Love does not insist on
its own way; it is not irritable or resentful
Second Timothy 3:2 For men will be lovers of self, lovers of money, proud,
arrogant, abusive, disobedient to their parents, ungrateful, unholy
Titus 1:7 For a bishop, as God’s steward, must be blameless; he must not
be arrogant or quick-tempered or a drunkard or violent or greedy for gain.
It thus behooves each of us to be patience and search out all the facts
before we utter our final assessment:
Ecclesiastes 7:8 Better is the end of a thing than its beginning; and the
patient in spirit is better than the proud in spirit.
First Corinthians 11:33 So then, my brethren, when you come together . . .
wait for one another
First Corinthians 14:31 For you can all prophesy one by one, so that all
may learn and all be encouraged
Revelation 12:10 And I heard a loud voice in heaven, saying, “Now the
salvation and the power and the kingdom of our God and the authority of
his Christ have come, for the accuser of our brethren has been thrown
down, who accuses them day and night before our God.
In any case, it is interesting to note the reaction of King David when
confronted by the actually-having-occurred potentially-Divinely-lethal
accusations of Nathan the Prophet in the Old Testament of the
Judeo-Christian (Old-&-New-Testament) Holy Bible pertaining to the
actually-having-occurred event of David indirectly-but-directly conspiring
to murder Uriah the Hittite after the actually-having-occurred phenomenon
of David committing adultery with murdered-Uriah’s beautiful exhibitionist
wife Bathsheba (who was actually bathing – probably nude – in the general
public view of David).
Moreover, there are ample indications that the
Christians-persecutor-pharisee trying-to-please-God Saul actually did see
the Light on the Damascus road according to the New-Testament book of Acts
which (or, better yet, Who) definitively and genuinely changed him into
completely-opposite-intentions-and-actio ns still-trying-to-please-God
Saint Paul.
As Ralph Waldo Emerson’s words state in Ralph Vaughn William’s Sea Symphony:
Yet soul be sure
The first intent remains
And shall be carried out.
The contest of GOP presidential candidates would be more interesting, less
confusing, and better for the country as a whole, if (at the time of this
writing) both non-commander-in-chief-type mere-economics-professor Ron
Paul and yet-pro-choice/homogay-nondiscriminating tricky-semantics,
Dole/McCain-retread Mitt Romney and even
less-qualified/less-professional-than-Gi ngrich Rick Santorum dropped out
of the race and left Newt Gingrich to compete against Barack Hussein Obama
for the 2012 Election.
Romney-Endorser John McCain’s videoclip about Non-Discrimination for
Homogays is found at the beginning of:
http://pseudomarriage.tripod.com/sodomar riage.htm
It is politically advantageous for Obominites to support Mitt Romney as
the GOP candidate for President in 2012, because they know that IF Romney
does become the GOP presidential nominee, Icorigin (and his growing number
of followers!) will vote 3rd party [ relating to
http://cdccmn2.tripod.com/atheism.htm ]
So, both Kenyan-and-not-Hawaiian-born Barack Hussein “Barry-Soetoro” Obama
and Mitt Romney are purported to allegedly be “christians?”
Below are some Bible verses or Scripturally-based statements which you
will probably NEVER hear either one quote or agree with:
(1) Jesus, the Son of God, was never created. He always existed back
throughout eternity.
(2) Homogays and homosodomites will not inherit the kingdom of God. [
Explore http://antihomogays.tripod.com ]
(3) Jesus is The Way, The Truth, and The Life. NO one (including mormons
and muslims) comes to the Father except through Him.
(4) No true Christian allows any woman to teach or have authority over
men; they are to keep silent.
(5) Women will be saved through childbearing, instead of committing (and
not “performing”) abortion-homicide or sterilizing themselves into
extinction using contraceptives.
(6) No harlot fornicator nor adulteress engaging in an [immoral] “affair”
will go to Heaven.
(7) Jesus Christ, the Son of God, created planet Earth and everything in
the entire Universe.
(8) The Holy Father, Jesus the Son of God, and the Holy Spirit are One
Triune God.
(9) Those who do not believe that Jesus Christ’s death on a cross cancels
the full penalty of all their sins will be forever tormented with the
flames of The Lake of Fire in Outer Darkness.
WHAT do credo-Catholic Newt and Callista believe?
[ Investigate political hotlinks at http://videoclips12.tripod.com ]
———————————————————————-
Fascinating it is that the Mormon Church bypasses ‘separation of “church”
and state’ by funding governmentally-enforced legislative and judicial
efforts in California to prevent same-gender “marriages” – yet Romney (a
cultic mormon who presumes that Jesus, the Son of God, was created by his
Elohim father and Virgin-Mary mother, and whose brother is Lucifer/Satan)
has declared in a videoclip at http://videoclips12.tripod.com that his
mormonic church doctrine will not interfere in his
‘separation-of-”church”-and-state’ public policies for homogay
inclusiveness and refusal to discriminate against homogays.
————————————————————————
OVERHEARD?
Guy 1: Gonna vote for Romney?
Guy 2: Heck No! Why would a guy be adamantly pro-choice for
abortion-homicide in Massachusetts, and accommodate Planned Parenthood in
that state, but then now pretend to be pro-life – on such a basic
religiously-related issue – when he said that the goody-goody moral
stances of his quasi-cultic mormon “church” would not affect his
public-policy decisions as Prez?
Guy 1: So you support Obama?
Guy 2: I never said that, did I?
Guy 1: Well obviously, if you don’t vote for Romney, you’ll be throwing
away your vote to Obama.
Guy 2: No I won’t. I won’t vote for either one, so neither gets my vote -
for or against. I’ll probably patriotically vote 3rd party, rather than
merely abstain and not vote at all.
Guy 1: Don’t you support any of the GOP presidential candidates -
imperfect as they are – like Ronald Reagan, who divorced his first wife
and brown-nosed the sexist feminists by appointing Sandra Day O’Connor to
the High Court?
After all, did not Newt put bathing-exhibitionist Bathsheba under duress
by ordering her up to his royal castle and getting her pregnant without
first marrying her, then set up her husband Uriah to be murdered who then
was indeed murdered, for which criminal act he never ever repented?
Guy 2: Callista knows.
If the November 2012 Election choice came down to Obama vs. Gingrich, who
do you think so-called “moderate” [republican] RINOs would vote for? You
know in your heart that most of them would not vote for Obama, but instead
(albeit perhaps fearfully and reluctantly) vote for Gingrich.
Guy 1: Got a point there.
And if genuine ultra-orthodox Christian Evangelicals and Jews (not to
mention fundamentalist Islamic) lose respect for Romney and consider him a
waffling and internally-dishonest wind-sniffer to simply get votes, he
probably would lose to charismatic Obama who has cunningly convinced
Americans that “things are gradually improving but more time is needed for
really-positive improvement” – being that Romney would remind such
confused voters of defeated compromisers H.W. Bush (who lost to Clinton in
’92 when Icorigin voted for Howard Phillips of the Constitution Party, Bob
Dole (who also lost to Clinton in ’96 when Icorigin again voted for Howard
Phillips of the Constitution Party, and McCain/Palin in 2008 (when
Icorigin voted for the Prez and VP candidates of the Constitution Party
once again).
- http://antihomogays.tripod.com
http://www.cfabamerica.com/issues-some-of-my-ideas%e2%80%a6your-thought-input-or-comments Dr Tolbert for 2012